Ivyisme 100%. Plaud would be dead in the water if it wasn’t for AI.
But aren’t we turning AI into a self-fulfilling prophecy?
- Investors throw money at anything that has “AI” on the business plan
- Companies put “AI” on their business plans because they want to get investment
- Investors see that “AI” is a trend so invest on anything that has “AI” on the business plan
Rabbit R1 was a cool product on paper, but still something that could be an app, provided it got the necessary permissions. Humane’s Ai Pin could be a dumb device connected to a smartphone and it would still unlock the same level of functionality.
At the end of the day companies want to go with the hardware + AI software features approach because this is the only way they have to keep the user tied into a subscription when a shiny new toy shows up. For the companies it works short term (and long term if they figure out a great product), but seeing this from a customer perspective, I’m not sure this is the best path for me.
I don’t want to be tied into ecosystems that force me to a subscription either upfront or when the investors’ money dries out, and they need to figure out a way to stay afloat. Samsung starts talking about charging AI features. Apple does too. Google already has a paywall for its premium features. If each AI-powered device needs its own subscription where will that leave us?